<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Elusive Starbucks Short</title>
	<link>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/</link>
	<description>Small products, small living, the smallest stuff in the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jim G</title>
		<link>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Jim G</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Interesting stuff on SBUX, but flawed. 
1) They don't take unit
volume into consideration. What if Alice doens't like to pay more than a buck
because she has 5 cups a day? and Charlie is rich cause he's a tightass and only
 buys a Venti once every two days. Alice is money. 

2) The difference between a
short and a tall is only about 15 cents. Problem could also be that we are
talking ``cappucino''' in the text but the graphs are talking ``coffee''  -- big
difference in profit margin I'm sure, as a short drip is less than $1.50 and a short
cap is almost $1 more than that.

But to your theme: that's probably why they don't push drip coffee. 

Adam Smith is widely know as the Al Bundy of economic minds. Always wash after shaking the invisible hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff on SBUX, but flawed.<br />
1) They don&#8217;t take unit<br />
volume into consideration. What if Alice doens&#8217;t like to pay more than a buck<br />
because she has 5 cups a day? and Charlie is rich cause he&#8217;s a tightass and only<br />
 buys a Venti once every two days. Alice is money. </p>
<p>2) The difference between a<br />
short and a tall is only about 15 cents. Problem could also be that we are<br />
talking &#8220;cappucino&#8221;&#8217; in the text but the graphs are talking &#8220;coffee&#8221;  &#8212; big<br />
difference in profit margin I&#8217;m sure, as a short drip is less than $1.50 and a short<br />
cap is almost $1 more than that.</p>
<p>But to your theme: that&#8217;s probably why they don&#8217;t push drip coffee. </p>
<p>Adam Smith is widely know as the Al Bundy of economic minds. Always wash after shaking the invisible hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: condour</title>
		<link>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-6</link>
		<author>condour</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>On 1, though, I think his basic point is still true.  Yes, it's oversimplifying to suggest the only reason Alice might not want the $ coffee is because she's poor.  But even if she just won the lottery, the marginal value of more than the $1.00 quantity might be very low -- either because she has a weak bladder, is extremely sensitive to caffeine, etc.  But you're right that creating a low-quality product (a la the no-frills line) might dissuade someone with a high unit volume.

The fact remains that Sbux's can maximize profits if they can sell a $1 cup without cannibalizing their $2 sales.

As far as 2) goes, I just used simple numbers and a single product for my chart.  In reality, drip coffee vs. fancy is a bit like the smaller coffee, although I'd guess it's less labor intensive than the cappuccino too -- and therefore the actual discrepancy in the production cost is more reflected in the price difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1, though, I think his basic point is still true.  Yes, it&#8217;s oversimplifying to suggest the only reason Alice might not want the $ coffee is because she&#8217;s poor.  But even if she just won the lottery, the marginal value of more than the $1.00 quantity might be very low &#8212; either because she has a weak bladder, is extremely sensitive to caffeine, etc.  But you&#8217;re right that creating a low-quality product (a la the no-frills line) might dissuade someone with a high unit volume.</p>
<p>The fact remains that Sbux&#8217;s can maximize profits if they can sell a $1 cup without cannibalizing their $2 sales.</p>
<p>As far as 2) goes, I just used simple numbers and a single product for my chart.  In reality, drip coffee vs. fancy is a bit like the smaller coffee, although I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s less labor intensive than the cappuccino too &#8212; and therefore the actual discrepancy in the production cost is more reflected in the price difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /shogo.john/ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; short coffee @ starbucks</title>
		<link>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-598</link>
		<author>/shogo.john/ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; short coffee @ starbucks</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smallist.com/2007/03/08/the-elusive-starbucks-short/#comment-598</guid>
					<description>[...] The Elusive Starbucks Short [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Elusive Starbucks Short [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
